Vlad17
Выживальщик
Иск в Спортлото будет в более выигрышном положении)
Главное что бы свидомит дальше жил мриями и перемогами, которые по древней укротрадиции трансформируются в зрады)))
Я думаю до суда дело не дойдет) Не пустят)))
[
Уже дошло до суда, иди с горя опохмелись стекломоем )))
http://www.pcacases.com/web/search/
Case name PJSC Ukrnafta v. The Russian Federation
Case description
The PCA acts as registry in this arbitration, which is being conducted under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976 pursuant to the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Encouragement and Mutual Protection of Investments dated 27 November 1998.
Name(s) of claimant(s) PJSC Ukrnafta ( Private entity )
Name(s) of respondent(s) The Russian Federation ( State )
Names of parties
Case number
Administering institution Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)
Case status Pending
Type of case Investment arbitration
Subject matter or economic sector Oil and gas
Rules used in arbitral proceedings UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976
Treaty or contract under which proceedings were commenced Bilateral treaty
Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Encouragement and Mutual Protection of Investments dated 27 November 1998
Country A: Russian Federation
Country B: Ukraine
Language of proceeding English
Seat of arbitration (by country) Switzerland
Arbitrator(s)
Professor Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler (Presiding Arbitrator)
Mr. Daniel M. Price
Professor Brigitte Stern
Representatives of the claimant(s)
Mr. John M. Townsend
Mr. James H. Boykin
Mr. Vitaly Morozov
HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP
(Washington, D.C., United States)
Mr. Marc-Olivier Langlois
Mr. Leon Ioannou
HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP
(Paris, France)
Representatives of the respondent(s)
Russia has not appointed any representatives. By letters dated 12 August 2015 and 15 September 2015 (received by the PCA on 18 September 2015), the Russian Federation indicated, inter alia, that the “[Ukraine-Russia BIT] cannot serve as a basis for composing an arbitral tribunal to settle [the Claimants’ claims]” and that it “does not recognize the jurisdiction of an international arbitral tribunal at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in settlement of [the Claimants’ claims].” The Russian Federation also stated that nothing in its correspondence “should be considered as consent of the Russian Federation to constitution of an arbitral tribunal, participation in arbitration proceedings or as procedural actions taken in the framework of the proceedings.”
Representatives of the parties
Number of arbitrators in case 3
По Коломойше тоже начали рассматривать
http://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1554